Crypto futures & perpetuals

Cross vs Isolated Margin in Crypto

Same trade. Different money backing it.

Isolated margin sets money aside for one position. Cross margin lets eligible positions draw support from a shared pool. For the same-sized position and the same price move, the price-related gain or loss is the same. What changes is which funds support it.

Account rules differ. Manual additions or enabled automatic top-ups can increase the money backing an isolated position. Here, collateral means the money or assets backing positions.

Scope: futures/perpetual positions, not spot borrowing, inverse contracts or a portfolio-margin simulation.

One trade, two ways to back it

Which money backs this trade?

A hypothetical Long in a linear USDT-style contract. Only the collateral arrangement changes.

Starting balance & equity
1,000 USDT
Trade value at entry
1,000 USDT
Entry price per unit
100 USDT
Long position quantity
10 units
Entry margin setting
10x
Initial margin at entry, no costs
100 USDT

After a 4% price fall · Price 96 USDT · −4%

Both positions lose 40 USDT.

Same trade. Same 40 loss. Different funds backing it.

10 × (96 − 100) = -40 USDT unrealized PnL, each

Isolated

Separate allocation

100 USDT allocated at entry

Position equity
60 USDT

100 − 40 = 60

Outside this allocation
900 USDT

Manual and automatic top-ups are off in this example.

900 outside + 60 in position = 960

Cross

Shared pool

All 1,000 USDT is eligible at entry

Shared pool equity
960 USDT

1,000 − 40 = 960

100 USDT initial requirement
Included within the starting 1,000. No extra 100 is added or deducted from equity.

One pool, one position in this example.

Current position value: 10 × 96 = 960 USDT in both cases. Box sizes show grouping, not a money scale.

At entry · Price 100 USDT · 0%

Both positions start with zero PnL.

Same 1,000 USDT trade. Different funds backing it.

10 × (100 − 100) = 0 USDT unrealized PnL, each

Isolated

Separate allocation

100 USDT allocated at entry

Position equity
100 USDT

100 + 0 = 100

Outside this allocation
900 USDT

Manual and automatic top-ups are off in this example.

900 outside + 100 in position = 1,000

Cross

Shared pool

All 1,000 USDT is eligible at entry

Shared pool equity
1,000 USDT

1,000 + 0 = 1,000

100 USDT initial requirement
Included within the starting 1,000. No extra 100 is added or deducted from equity.

One pool, one position in this example.

Current position value: 10 × 100 = 1,000 USDT in both cases. Box sizes show grouping, not a money scale.

Read the totals together. After the fall, the isolated position has 60 and its account has 960. The cross pool has 960. These are different levels of the same accounting comparison, not different losses.

Example assumptions: one open position; no other orders, positions, debts, transfers, collateral discounts or cross-currency effects. No fees, funding or top-ups. Both positions remain open by assumption: this is not a liquidation survival test or a maximum-loss guarantee.

The 100 requirement and 10x setting describe entry, not a fixed ongoing requirement or account-wide leverage. Selecting 10x does not force this 1,000 balance to open a 10,000 trade. The loss is unrealized and counted once in equity; 960 is not a withdrawable-balance estimate.

What actually changes?

Margin mode describes the backing arrangement. Trade value describes the position’s exposure. Equity includes unrealized PnL; the example’s ledger balance stays at 1,000 while equity falls to 960. Neither number automatically tells you how much you can withdraw.

Question Isolated margin Cross margin
Which funds back the position? Its assigned allocation, including any later additions. The eligible shared collateral pool.
What happens to this 40 USDT loss? Position equity falls from 100 to 60; total account equity is 960. Shared pool equity falls from 1,000 to 960.
Can other positions matter? Their PnL is separate from this allocation; transfers or top-ups can change its backing. Their results and margin requirements can affect the same pool.
Is the original backing fixed forever? No. Manual or enabled automatic additions may increase it. No. Positions, transfers, costs and collateral values can change the pool.
Does the mode improve this trade’s PnL? No: same quantity and prices, same price-related PnL. No: the supporting pool does not change the price move.

Three misconceptions to leave behind

“Cross means more profit.”

Our Long still contains 10 units. Each loses 4 USDT when price moves from 100 to 96, so the price-related unrealized loss is 40 in either mode. Adding backing does not buy more units by itself. Different quantities, costs or executions would be a different comparison.

“The original isolated margin can never increase.”

It can. Manual additions are supported on some venues. Bybit’s Auto-Margin Replenishment, when enabled for supported isolated positions, can move available account funds into a position. This changes its backing without changing quantity by itself. It does not guarantee that liquidation will be avoided.

The 900 outside our allocation stays outside because the example excludes both manual and automatic additions. That is an assumption to check, not a promise that selecting isolated always protects a particular sum.

“A farther liquidation estimate means less money exposed.”

A position may have more room before a trigger because more money supports it. That does not reduce the dollar loss from the same price move. A liquidation distance and the amount of collateral supporting a position answer different questions. This comparison neither predicts liquidation nor ranks either mode as safer.

Why can an account change move a liquidation estimate?

A shared pool can change even when this position’s quantity does not. Another position may gain or lose money, an order may reserve margin, or a transfer may change the available collateral. Maintenance requirements and collateral valuations also depend on venue rules.

For a concrete distinction, Bybit’s Unified Trading Account documentation says isolated liquidation is triggered when Mark Price reaches the liquidation price. Under its cross mode, the trigger is Account Maintenance Margin Rate reaching 100%; the displayed liquidation price is a reference estimate. Those are Bybit’s stated rules, not a universal exchange formula.

The illustrated positions remain open by assumption. A stopped or liquidated position is a different state: its execution, fees and settlement need separate treatment. Even positive equity is not proof that a position meets a venue’s maintenance requirement.

What to check on your exchange

  • Pool boundary: which account, assets and positions share collateral, and whether asset values are discounted for collateral purposes.
  • Top-ups: whether isolated additions are manual, automatic, enabled or limited, and where the extra funds come from.
  • Open-position requirements: maintenance margin, relevant price reference, fees and funding; the entry requirement alone is not the full picture.
  • Available funds: what remains usable for orders or withdrawals after other obligations. Pool equity and withdrawal capacity are different measures.
  • Switching rules: whether the mode applies per position or across the account, and whether existing positions, orders or borrowing prevent a switch.

For example, Bybit’s switching criteria include account conditions. A mode switch is not something this guide can promise for every open trade. Use your venue’s current documentation for the specific account and contract.

Try these numbers

Open this isolated example

The position's margin is 100, not the full 1,000 account balance. At 10x and entry 100, that gives the same 10 units. Scenario exit 96 gives −40 before costs.

Open this isolated example

Uses our simplified isolated-position model, not a cross-margin account calculation.

The price is already set to 96. In the calculator, choose “Check another exit price” to reveal the Scenario exit result. Target and Stop are blank, costs and advanced assumptions are zero, and account equity is omitted.

Five quick questions

Can cross margin use my whole balance?

It can use the whole eligible shared pool. That does not automatically include every asset, subaccount or external wallet you own. Check the account's collateral settings and obligations. All 1,000 USDT is eligible only because this example assumes it.

Can an isolated position receive extra funds?

Yes, where supported: you may add margin manually, or an enabled top-up feature may transfer available funds. The example keeps both off. Its original 100 USDT allocation is not a universal maximum-loss promise.

Does cross margin make the same trade more profitable?

No. With identical quantity, entry and comparison price, price-related PnL is identical. Fees, funding, changes to the position or different execution outcomes can change the actual result. More supporting money alone does not increase the position's gain.

Can I switch modes with an open position?

Do not assume so. Eligibility and whether a setting applies to a position or the account depend on the venue. Bybit's UTA comparison lists account-level switching conditions; check the current rules for your own account before expecting a switch to work.

Why can't one liquidation formula cover every account?

The required inputs differ: collateral eligibility and value, other positions, maintenance tiers, fees, reference prices and account rules. A one-position isolated formula cannot represent every cross account. This page calculates no cross liquidation price and recommends no mode.

About this example and review

Sources checked 11 September 2026. The arithmetic and financial wording were reviewed by a separate AI reviewer, with automated checks for both snapshots and the calculator link. This is not a human expert endorsement or an exchange-verified account model.

Continue with how leverage changes a position, the calculator's formulas and model limits, or worked leverage examples.